art is about expression, freedom to make, and in numerous techniques it's the embodiment of chaos; you may begin out with an idea of what you need to develop, but some thing may take place along the solution to alter the final outcome. With photography in thoughts, you may alter the composition of the shot in the final minute, nuances within the natural light that you are shooting in may possibly alter the tone or feel of the image captured, there are various variables that you just have no control over - and some you do.
Science however doesn't deal in chaos or expression. It is too exact in its wish to define and produce a given result. The dictionary definition of science consists of several inform tale words; Objective, systematic, formulated, organised... Look up the word art' in a dictionary and words such as; Creative, imaginative, ideas, skill, workmanship, expression... See where I'm going with this?
Now i am not knocking science here, I'm a fan. It is just the overlay of the word science with photography merely does not sit ideal for me. The act of taking a stunning image needs an artistic eye; it is not a formulated, objective and organised act. It is one of chaos, and option and altering your mind in regards to the F quit or the ISO in the final minute. But wait, would it be?
Any photographer will inform you that you have to have to understand what that you are doing. You cannot just choose up a camera and begin randomly shooting and expect to create ideal or even intriguing images. A band of researchers gave a list of chimps a video camera recently. The chimps walked about and shot video with it and yes, it was fairly chaotic, but was it any fantastic? Effectively no, not seriously. So organisation and a systematic and formulaic strategy are necessary following all.
Maybe what I'm really saying here is that we really should not be so hung up about sorting one on the other; maybe the two can and the truth is do coexist in digital photography. Take into consideration this as it were. The ability to create a genuinely spectacular image calls for an artistic eye, it demands creativity from the author, an notion, the use of imagination and skill, but it also requires structured expertise. The ability to organise and operate all of the equipment, select the best F stop or shutter speed, as well as to have the ability to apply a attempted and tested formula to get the kind of image that you wish. There you have it; both science and art operating together in hand.